12 research outputs found

    RAB25 expression is epigenetically downregulated in oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with lymph node metastasis

    Get PDF
    Oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) have a low survival rate, mainly due to metastasis to the regional lymph nodes. For optimal treatment of these metastases, a neck dissection is required; however, inaccurate detection methods results in under- and over-treatment. New DNA prognostic methylation biomarkers might improve lymph node metastases detection. To identify epigenetically regulated genes associated with lymph node metastases, genome-wide methylation analysis was performed on 6 OOSCC with (pN+) and 6 OOSCC without (pN0) lymph node metastases and combined with a gene expression signature predictive for pN+ status in OOSCC. Selected genes were validated using an independent OOSCC cohort by immunohistochemistry and pyrosequencing, and on data retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas. A two-step statistical selection of differentially methylated sequences revealed 14 genes with increased methylation status and mRNA downregulation in pN+ OOSCC. RAB25, a known tumor suppressor gene, was the highest-ranking gene in the discovery set. In the validation sets, both RAB25 mRNA (P = 0.015) and protein levels (P = 0.012) were lower in pN+ OOSCC. RAB25 mRNA levels were negatively correlated with RAB25 methylation levels (P < 0.001) but RAB25 protein expression was not. Our data revealed that promoter methylation is a mechanism resulting in downregulation of RAB25 expression in pN+ OOSCC and decreased expression is associated with lymph node metastasis. Detection of RAB25 methylation might contribute to lymph node metastasis diagnosis and serve as a potential new therapeutic target in OOSCC

    Proliferative activity in human brain tumors:Comparison of histopathology and L-[1-C-11]tyrosine PET

    No full text
    To validate the protein synthesis rate (PSR) measured in human brain tumors using L-[1-C-11]tyrosine (TYR) PET, the PSR was compared to histopathological parameters that reflect proliferation and protein synthesis. Methods: We studied 20 patients who had a brain biopsy and who also underwent a PET study with TYR. Paraffin sections were stained with the monoclonal antibody MIB 1, targeted against the core antigen Ki-67, and nucleolar organizer regions (NORs) were measured as argyrophilic NORs (AgNORs). The TYR uptake was measured by PET, and with a kinetic model, the PSR was determined. Results: PSR (nmol/ml/min) ranged from 0.44 to 1.99 (mean, 0.97), Ki-67 labeling indices (%) ranged from 0.9 to 33.5 (mean, 9.5) and AgNOR area (mm(2)/cm(2)) ranged from 0.13 to 0.85. No relationship was found between PSR and Ki-67 labeling index or AgNOR area. Conclusion: It seems that the PSR and proliferation, as measured by Ki-67, are independent processes. The role of the PSR is uncertain, but it is likely that it can be seen as a marker for the homeostasis of the cell

    Translocation (11;22)(q24;q12) in a small cell tumor of the thigh in a 2-year-old boy:Immunohistology, cytogenetics, molecular genetics, and review of the literature

    No full text
    A case of a 2-year-old boy with a palpable mass in the left thigh is presented. Incisional biopsy was performed and subsequent histopathological examination revealed an infiltrative tumor composed of relatively large cells. The tumor cells were immunoreactive for vimentin and keratin, but not for desmin or smooth muscle actin. Cytogenetic analysis showed a 46,XY,t(11;22)(q24;q12) karyotype. The translocation (11;22)(q24;q12) is said to be characteristic for the family of Ewing's sarcoma and related tumors. As a result of the t(11;22)(q24;q12) the EWS gene on chromosome 22q12 joins the 3' part of FLI-1 gene on chromosome 11q24, which encodes a member of the ets family of transcriptional regulators. Using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) a corresponding EWS-FLI-1 fusion product was detected. Additional immunohistological staining for p30/p32MIC2, which is suggestive, but not specific for Ewing's sarcoma, appeared to be weakly positive. In the current case a diagnosis of Ewing's sarcoma was considered unlikely, because of the location of the tumor and the immunohistological profile. Nevertheless it was decided to treat the patient according to a Ewing's sarcoma protocol based on the genotype of the tumor. The findings were compared with other extraosseous pediatric small cell tumors showing the t(11;22)(q24;q12) described in the literature

    The 16p11 breakpoint in myxoid liposarcomas might affect the expression of the LRP gene on 16p11.2 encoding the multidrug resistance associated major vault protein

    No full text
    Background Chromosome breakage could influence the expression of genes. This has been noticed in specific cases of acute myeloid leukaemia, where the 16p13 breakpoint affects the expression of the multidrug resistance related protein (MRP). Myxoid liposarcomas (LPS) are characterized by the t(12; 16)(q13; p11), which leads to the formation of a FUS-CHOP fusion transcript. This study investigates the relationship between the cytogenetically detected breakpoint 16p11 in myxoid LPS, the presence of the FUS-CHOP fusion transcript in nonmyxoid LPS and the expression of the lung resistance major vault protein (LRP) gene on 16p11.2. Materials and methods Of 16 cases with a diagnosis of a (possible) liposarcoma with an abnormal karyotype, fresh frozen tumour material was available for immunohistological detection of LRP. Cases without a cytogenetically detected t(12; 16)(q13; p11), were analyzed for the presence of a FUS-CHOP fusion transcript by RT-PCR. Results In all 9 myxoid LPS a t(12; 16)(q13; p11) was found and LRP expression was absent or low. In none of the remaining 7 cases was a FUS-CHOP fusion transcript found, and four tumours were LRP positive (P = 0.02). LRP expression in myxoid LPS (mean: 1.3%) was lower (P = 0.07) than in the nonmyxoid tumours (mean: 35.7%). Conclusions These observations indicate a relation between the t(12; 16)(q13; p11), leading to a FUS-CHOP fusion transcript in myxoid LPS, and the low or absent expression of the LRP-gene located on 16p11.2

    Soft tissue leiomyosarcomas and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors: Differences in clinical outcome and expression of multidrug resistance proteins

    No full text
    Purpose: Several studies have reported clinical behavior and chemotherapy resistance in leiomyosarcomas, but these studies did not differentiate between soft tissue leiomyosarcomas (LMS) and malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST), Multidrug resistance (MDR) has been associated with the expression of p-glycoprotein (P-gp), multidrug resistance protein (MRP1), and lung resistance protein (LRP). The aim of the present study wets to compare LMS and GIST with respect to clinical outcome and MDR parameters. Patients and Methods: Clinical outcome wets evaluated in 29 patients with a primary deep-seated LMS and 26 patients with a primary malignant GIST. Paraffin-embedded material, available for 26 patients with LMS and 25 with GIST, was used for immunohistochemical detection of p-gp, MRP1, LRP, and c-kit. Results: Mean overall survival (OS) was 72 months for LMS patients and 31 months for GIST patients (P <.05). Metastases occurred in 16 (59%) of 27 assessable LMS patients and in 10 (56%) of 18 assessable GIST patients. LMS predominantly metastasized to the lungs (14 of 16 patients), whereas GIST tended to spread to the liver (five of 10 patients) and the abdominal cavity (three of 10 patients; P <.001), p-gp and MRP1 expression was more pronounced in GIST than in LMS (P <.05): the mean percentage of p-gp expressing cells was 13.4% in patients with LMS and 38.4% in patients with GIST, and the mean percentage MRP1 expressing cells was 13.3% in patients with LMS and 35.4% in patients with GIST, LRP expression did not differ between LMS and GIST. c-kit was expressed in 5% of the LMS patients and in 68% of the GIST patients. Conclusion: LMS patients have a better survival than GIST patients, and the metastatic pattern is different Expression of MDR proteins in LMS is less pronounced than in GIST. (C) 2000 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
    corecore